Connecting blockchain technologies

The company has already gained experience in connecting blockchain technologies with the energy market. In August 2016, the first blockchain-based energy trading network went online, but only for testing purposes. This platform was then successfully used in New Zealand. In the second half of 2017, an energy management system that distributes locally generated renewable energy followed.

pros and cons of Bitcoin Trader

And this is one of the advantages of the project: We are not dealing with an unknown, faceless team that only presents a white paper. Power Ledger is a company that has already proven that it can combine energy trading with blockchain technology. The platform has the potential to revolutionize the energy market. Cheaper electricity, fairly distributed and it also allows private individuals to sell their unneeded electricity. It is noteworthy how it allows even small electricity providers to flourish and make a profit. The humanitarian aspect of this must not be neglected. Established energy companies will certainly not be pleased.

Power Ledger Price

Since the launch of the POWR token in November 2017, the price has risen from €0.17 to €0.75 the same month. In the remainder of November and December of the year, the power ledger price fluctuated between €0.40 and €0.60. In the second half of December the price rose again, this time the crypto currency broke the €1 mark. However, the company achieved the best results with its token in January 2018, when the price was quoted at € 1.57 on January 7.
After that, the good mood on the crypto markets eased and the price fell below € 1 during the rest of January. In February, the price fluctuated between € 0.40 and € 0.60. In March it finally fell below € 0.30, but an upward trend seems to prevail again for April.
The forecast: The token was already among the top 100 crypto currencies on the market after only a few weeks. Maybe the course doesn’t look that spectacular, but the token has only been around for a short time. If the project develops well, a price increase can be expected at any time. Buying cheap power ledgers is still possible at the moment and could pay off.

Create Wallet
The Power Legder Token is an ERC20 token based on Ethereum. Since the company has not yet created its own Power Ledger Wallet, the token must be stored on an Ethereum-compatible Wallet. Ledger Nano S or Trezor could be used as hardware wallets; on the software side, the tokens can be stored with the MyEtherWallet or MetaMask.

Where can I buy the Power Ledger?

Buying Power Ledger is possible on several crypto exchanges. The largest volumes are on Upbit, followed by Binance and Bittrex. Other possible exchanges are Huobi, KuCoin, Bancor Network, Cryptopia and

Power Ledger has the potential to revolutionize the electricity market. And this for the benefit of the consumer, green energy and smaller electricity providers. This is creating a peer-to-peer platform that distributes renewable energy worldwide and offers it at fair prices. The development of the platform is not yet complete, but the project looks very promising.

Do you want to learn more about crypto currencies and the latest ICOs, Airdrops & the most profitable top coins? Then CLICK HERE and visit our CryptoWealthCenter.

EU Parliament report shows how banks could defeat Bitcoin

A recent European Parliament report explains how a crypto currency issued by the central bank could surpass the decentralised currency Bitcoin.

European Parliament vs. Bitcoin

The current report entitled “Competition Issues in the Area of Financial Technology (FinTech)” lists some challenges Bitcoin has to overcome.

The report requested by the ECON Committee claims that the digital currencies issued by the central banks could have a significant impact on the current crypto currency market.

The introduction of authorised crypto currencies promoted by banks, including central banks, will change the current competition in the crypto currency market and increase the number of competitors.

The report also distinguishes between privately issued digital currencies such as Bitcoin and those issued by central banks and compares them.

Banks vs. Bitcoin
According to the study, commercial and central banks could easily bring english down the bitcoin rate and the rates of other crypto currencies by blocking access to exchanges or wallets for users or by performing a denial of access attack.

In addition, the report found that the influence of banks can be used for traditional banking services to “limit competition in the crypto currency market through preventive measures or predatory practices”.

Bitcoin’s competition problems with banks
The study distinguishes between two types of competition problems:

Crypto currencies as part of the inter-crypto market

Service providers (stock exchanges, mining and wallets) as part of the intra-crypto currency
The first problem is described as complex and concerns, for example, the fact that once a crypto currency has a large community, it becomes difficult to create a new crypto currency that is larger than the first.

This could lead to high market entry barriers for new crypto currencies and “in the future […] may have consequences for possible agreements between members of hypothetical cartels”.

The second problem includes preventive measures or predatory practices by banks that could abuse your influence and act anti-competitively.

For example, banks could easily exclude deposits from or withdrawals to bitcoin exchanges, which would make it impossible to buy or sell crypto currencies.

Alternatively, they could charge surcharges for the settlement of crypto transactions or extremely slow down their service for such bookings so that users of crypto currencies are discouraged in order to better market their own central crypto currency.

Ethereum heading $800 despite SEC meeting

A working group of high-ranking SEC and CFTC officials is preparing for 7 May, because once again possible regulations of crypto currencies are being discussed. All eyes are on Ethereum, because the crypto currency has gained a lot in the last week. However, Ethereum still faces major hurdles as there is a possibility that the SEC may regard the crypto currency as a security. The market seems at least confident, as the price of ether is rising towards $800.

Ether rises to $800 before SEC and CFTC meeting
A recent WSJ report has shaken the cryptoecosystem with the news that SEC and CFTC officials are about to decide whether Ethereum and Ripple are securities. Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin said this week that the team that developed the platform and technology were concerned about this scenario early on.


Ethereum’s Lubin goes one step further by opposing the regulation of Ethereum on the basis of the current regulatory system. In order to be legally considered a security, “Ethereum” must pass the Howey test of 1933, and Ethereum does not.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has conducted dozens of investigations into ICOs, which found that the tokens sold to raise capital are securities. This would classify Ethereum as a security, regardless of whether it functions decentrally and without a company.

Legal certainty is an invaluable advantage when it comes to the institutional introduction of the crypto currency. Regardless of whether or not regulators regard crypto currencies as securities, a final official decision may create the much needed confidence to promote scamcontrol the introduction of Bitcoin & Co. worldwide. Of course, we all hope that there will be a reasonable distinction between crypto currencies.


At a hearing of the SEC and the CFTC in February, Giancarlo had proposed to the CFTC that a “non-damaging” registration process for blockchain and crypto currency companies be implemented. We will see what will be presented in the discussion round on 7 May. It seems that at least the community agrees, because Ethereum’s price is literally exploding.

Who’s behind Ripple?

The Ripple protocol is developed by Ripple Labs, which is backed by various investors. Ripple Labs differs from many other companies in the IT industry in that the revenues are not generated from advertising or fees. Those responsible only hope for profits from the increase in value of the 25 billion ripple coins retained. The primary business objective is therefore to spread the currency further and to increase the benefits for network participants. It is expected that more and more participants will want to buy Ripple, which of course increases the Ripple price accordingly. Because XRP also accounts for a significant portion of Ripple Labs’ working capital, the currency can be compared to a share. If you decide to buy Ripple Coins after a Ripple analysis, you can also benefit from the economic success of Ripple Labs. If you want to act as an investor, you should of course regularly inform yourself about the latest Ripple News. After all, strong price fluctuations are quite possible.

The advantages and disadvantages

One of the advantages is that the Ripple protocol is an open standard through which existing payment networks can be connected. The protocol can therefore be compared to the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, which was developed in the 1980s to connect different message systems. In addition, Ripple is forgery-proof and enables fast transactions – normally it takes only a few seconds until a transaction is completed. Participants may also be mutually indebted via IOUs. Once the system has been finally expanded, it can serve as a universal translator between different currencies.

Where can users buy Ripple Coin?

The payment method is comparable to that of PayPal, with the difference that there is no central provider behind Ripple. Users can purchase from various payment service providers such as Bitstamp Ripple Coin by transferring an appropriate amount of money. The corresponding account balance is then stored in the network and the owner can dispose of it as required.

However, there are also some disadvantages. The network protocol makes it possible to move account balances between the various trusted third parties without the user’s involvement. This can pose a considerable risk for the individual user. Critics also see a disadvantage in the fact that Ripple is based on the concept of debt between individual users. However, these are not necessarily paid, which is why the promissory notes do not really have the equivalent value they represent. However, this aspect basically applies to all existing monetary systems.